What is SEER2, and how is it different from SEER?
SEER2 measures seasonal cooling efficiency under the DOE test procedure in force since January 1, 2023, which tests at a higher and more realistic external static pressure. It replaced SEER, and DOE states plainly that the two figures are not directly comparable, so a SEER number from an older article cannot be judged against a SEER2 number on a current quote.
- In force since
- 2023-01-01
- Replaces
- SEER
- National minimum, split AC
- 13.4 SEER2
What exactly is SEER2?
SEER2 is the ratio of total heat removed from the conditioned space over a cooling season to the total electrical energy the equipment consumed over that season, measured under the DOE test procedure required since January 1, 2023.
A higher SEER2 means less electricity for the same cooling. The nationwide federal minimum for a split-system air conditioner is 13.4 SEER2, and in the Southeast and Southwest the regional minimum for units under 45,000 Btu/h rises to 14.3 SEER2.
How is SEER2 different from the old SEER?
SEER is the pre-2023 seasonal cooling efficiency metric. Any SEER figure you find in an article written before 2023 is on this scale, which is why it cannot be compared directly against the SEER2 number on a current quote.
The difference is not the formula so much as the test bench. The procedure in force since 2023 tests at a higher external static pressure, which is much closer to what equipment meets in a real house on real ducts than the older, more optimistic lab condition.
Which generation is your number?
Current metric
SEER2 is on the current scale. It measures seasonal cooling efficiency under the DOE test procedure required since January 1, 2023. You can compare it directly against other SEER2 figures on today's quotes.
How do I use this when comparing bids?
- Ask for the SEER2 figure, not SEER, and ask for it in writing.
- Ask for the AHRI reference number for the exact combination being quoted.
- If a bid quotes only a SEER number, ask why. It is either pre-2023 equipment or a copied spec sheet, and both are worth knowing about.
- Compare SEER2 against SEER2 across all three bids. Never mix scales.
What actually drives the cost?
We publish no national average price, and the reason matters: an average across every house, region and system type is not a number you can act on. A replacement that includes duct modification, an electrical upgrade and a permit is a different job from a straight swap, and both read as “system replacement” on a one-page proposal.
What actually drives your number:
- Equipment capacity and tier, which should come from the Manual J rather than the old nameplate.
- The ducts — whether they can move the air the new equipment needs, and what it costs if they cannot.
- Electrical work, if a circuit or panel change is required.
- Permit and inspection, usually required.
- Refrigerant — current equipment uses R-454B or R-32; remaining pre-2025 R-410A stock may price differently.
Which efficiency numbers can you actually compare?
If you are comparing efficiency figures, check which generation they belong to first. On January 1, 2023 DOE changed the test procedure and renamed three metrics: SEER became SEER2, EER became EER2, and HSPF became HSPF2. The current procedure measures at a higher external static pressure, much closer to what equipment meets once installed in a real house on real ductwork.
DOE is explicit about the consequence: “Although SEER2, HSPF2, and EER2 ratings are similar to ratings using the original metrics, they are not directly comparable. Compliance with the new standards for each model must be determined based on its measured SEER2, HSPF2, or EER2.” In practice: a SEER figure from a 2019 article cannot tell you whether a quote reading SEER2 is good, bad or identical.
That is why we publish no conversion factor. We do not publish a SEER-to-SEER2 conversion factor. DOE states that ratings on the new metrics are "not directly comparable" to ratings on the original metrics, and that compliance must be determined from the measured SEER2, EER2 or HSPF2 value. Approximate multipliers circulate widely, but they vary by equipment type and configuration, and using one to compare an old article's number against a number on today's quote is how homeowners end up believing they were offered less efficiency than they were. Compare like with like: ask for the SEER2 figure, and check it against the AHRI certificate.
The nationwide minimum for a split-system air conditioner is 13.4 SEER2, and for a split-system heat pump 14.3 SEER2 with 7.5 HSPF2. What each metric measures · minimums by region and state.
How is the right equipment size decided?
Nearly every persistent comfort problem traces back to equipment size, and size is decided before the first box arrives. The standard is the ACCA Manual J load calculation (ANSI/ACCA 2 Manual J - 2016), which totals the heat gain and loss of your specific house: orientation, window area and type, insulation levels, air infiltration, internal gains, and your local design temperature.
What a Manual J is not: square feet per ton, and not the old unit's tonnage. The first ignores everything that makes one house different from another. The second assumes whoever sized the old equipment got it right, and propagates their error for another fifteen years.
Oversized equipment reaches the setpoint and shuts off before it has dehumidified, so the house ends up cold and clammy at the same time. Every start is also the hardest moment in a compressor's life, so wear accelerates. And you pay for the surplus capacity twice — once to buy it and again to run it.
Ask for the completed Manual J in writing, not the claim that one was done. What it contains and how to read it.
What should a bid show you?
Three bids rarely quote the same job, so comparing headline price compares three different things. The one that was done properly shows its work, and you can check it line by line:
- Model numbers for the outdoor unit, indoor coil, and air handler or furnace.
- The AHRI reference number for that exact combination. A rating applies to a matched system, not to an outdoor unit on its own.
- The SEER2 and, on a heat pump, the HSPF2 of that combination.
- The Manual J result the sizing came from.
- The measured static pressure and any duct work included.
- The permit, and who pulls it.
- Labour warranty, separate from parts, and whether registration is required.
How can you verify any of this yourself?
Everything regulatory on this site traces to a primary source and carries the date it was read: DOE for efficiency standards, EPA for refrigerants and Section 608, the IRS for tax credits, and ACCA for load calculation. The sources for this page are listed at the end with the date each was consulted.
If you find a different figure elsewhere, check two things before deciding which to believe: whether the page says which generation its efficiency metric belongs to, and whether it carries a visible review date. Most of the outdated content in this category fails both tests.
Sources (2)
- U.S. Department of Energy — Central Air Conditioners — Conservation Standards guidance (Final, October 5, 2022) (accessed 2026-08-17)
- Code of Federal Regulations — 10 CFR 430.32(c) — Energy conservation standards for central air conditioners and heat pumps (accessed 2026-08-17)