SEER vs SEER2: what is the difference?
SEER2 replaced SEER for equipment manufactured on or after January 1, 2023, under a DOE test procedure that measures at a higher, more realistic external static pressure. DOE states the two are not directly comparable, so a SEER figure and a SEER2 figure cannot be judged against each other.
The criteria being compared
Both measure seasonal cooling efficiency. What separates them is the test procedure, the date each applies to, and whether you can put them side by side.
| Criterion | SEER | SEER2 |
|---|---|---|
| Status | Superseded | Current |
| Applies to equipment made | Before 2023-01-01 | On or after 2023-01-01 |
| Test static pressure | Lower (older procedure) | Higher, closer to a real installation |
| Comparable to the other? | No | No |
| Nationwide split-AC minimum | n/a | 13.4 SEER2 |
The verdict
Use SEER2, and only SEER2, to compare current bids. If a proposal quotes a SEER number, it is either describing pre-2023 equipment or has been copied from an old spec sheet — both worth asking about. We publish no conversion factor between them, because DOE does not support one and applying an approximate multiplier is how a homeowner concludes they were offered less efficiency than they actually were.
Ask for the SEER2 figure and the AHRI reference number for the exact matched combination.
How do you recognise a good contractor?
Not by the brand they sell, and not by how long they have been in business. You recognise them by what they measure before quoting, and by what they are willing to put in writing.
What actually drives the cost?
We publish no national average price, and the reason matters: an average across every house, region and system type is not a number you can act on. A replacement that includes duct modification, an electrical upgrade and a permit is a different job from a straight swap, and both read as “system replacement” on a one-page proposal.
What actually drives your number:
- Equipment capacity and tier, which should come from the Manual J rather than the old nameplate.
- The ducts — whether they can move the air the new equipment needs, and what it costs if they cannot.
- Electrical work, if a circuit or panel change is required.
- Permit and inspection, usually required.
- Refrigerant — current equipment uses R-454B or R-32; remaining pre-2025 R-410A stock may price differently.
What should a bid show you?
Three bids rarely quote the same job, so comparing headline price compares three different things. The one that was done properly shows its work, and you can check it line by line:
- Model numbers for the outdoor unit, indoor coil, and air handler or furnace.
- The AHRI reference number for that exact combination. A rating applies to a matched system, not to an outdoor unit on its own.
- The SEER2 and, on a heat pump, the HSPF2 of that combination.
- The Manual J result the sizing came from.
- The measured static pressure and any duct work included.
- The permit, and who pulls it.
- Labour warranty, separate from parts, and whether registration is required.
How is the right equipment size decided?
Nearly every persistent comfort problem traces back to equipment size, and size is decided before the first box arrives. The standard is the ACCA Manual J load calculation (ANSI/ACCA 2 Manual J - 2016), which totals the heat gain and loss of your specific house: orientation, window area and type, insulation levels, air infiltration, internal gains, and your local design temperature.
What a Manual J is not: square feet per ton, and not the old unit's tonnage. The first ignores everything that makes one house different from another. The second assumes whoever sized the old equipment got it right, and propagates their error for another fifteen years.
Oversized equipment reaches the setpoint and shuts off before it has dehumidified, so the house ends up cold and clammy at the same time. Every start is also the hardest moment in a compressor's life, so wear accelerates. And you pay for the surplus capacity twice — once to buy it and again to run it.
Ask for the completed Manual J in writing, not the claim that one was done. What it contains and how to read it.
Why do the ducts matter as much as the equipment?
Equipment capacity is rated at a specific airflow. If the ducts cannot move that air, the equipment cannot deliver what its label promises, and the homeowner concludes they were oversold.
The number that reveals it is static pressure: the resistance the blower works against, measured in inches of water column. It is to a duct system roughly what blood pressure is to a person. A contractor who measures it before quoting a replacement is doing the job; one who does not is assuming your ducts are fine.
Duct design has its own ACCA standard, Manual D, and it is the step most often skipped on a replacement because the ducts already exist and reusing them costs nothing up front. What Manual D determines · ducts and airflow.
How can you verify any of this yourself?
Everything regulatory on this site traces to a primary source and carries the date it was read: DOE for efficiency standards, EPA for refrigerants and Section 608, the IRS for tax credits, and ACCA for load calculation. The sources for this page are listed at the end with the date each was consulted.
If you find a different figure elsewhere, check two things before deciding which to believe: whether the page says which generation its efficiency metric belongs to, and whether it carries a visible review date. Most of the outdated content in this category fails both tests.
Sources (2)
- U.S. Department of Energy — Central Air Conditioners — Conservation Standards guidance (Final, October 5, 2022) (accessed 2026-08-17)
- Code of Federal Regulations — 10 CFR 430.32(c) (accessed 2026-08-17)